The
headline in Forbes 10 July 07 read:
China Executes Ex Food and Drug Chief!
(http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/07/10/ap3899869.html).
Gosh
golly!!! What a novel idea, actually
holding someone responsible for the
lives and welfare of the public as
actually being responsible! And what
a novel idea for punishing them for
not so doing and paying for the human
suffering their actions bring about!!!
Wow!!! Let’s start a grass roots
movement to have the same law here
in the US!!! The death penalty with
limited appeal capabilities so the
sentence is carried out as swiftly
as in the Communist tyrannies!
After
the law gets passed, concerned Americans
can push the Justice Dept. to start bringing
former heads and officials of the FDA
to trial for capital crimes. Let’s
see, since Nutrasweet effects from blindness
to brain impairment amount to over 70%
of the complaints the FDA gets yearly
since the introduction of the sweetener
in 1983, so it'll start with bringing
the FDA chief from back then to trial.
Next they'll get to try every FDA chief
since then for allowing Nutrasweet to
stay on the market.
Every
now and then these government “officials” go
after some vitamin company or some small
generic drug maker just to make it seem
as if they are doing their job of enforcing
the law in regards to drug safety. They
don’t touch the big boys and when
one of their members, like the FDA’s
maverick Dr. David Graham, dares to go
after a big player, like Merck for Vioxx,
he gets shut down from above. Dr. Graham
next wanted to go after the deadly anti-cholesterol
drugs - he was stopped cold from doing
that. As for the politicians who should
be protecting the whistle-blowers, we’ve
already published a list of what a good
few of them get from the drug companies,
why shouldn't we think the politicos
would be beholding to the folks who fund
and support them? Look at the list, the
larger the cash flow from the drug cartels
to them the more an enemy of the nutritional
industry and natural medicine they are!
There is a direct and positive correlation
as they say in statistics! More about
them later.
Next,
the enforcers of the new law can charge
Carters’ FDA chief for allowing
the arthritis drug Oraflex to be sold
in the US after the clinical trials for
it in England killed over 460 people!
The good point of that was that ignoring
those victims enabled the drug company
to make their Research and Development
money back. The bad point: the drug killed
1600 Americans in the process. Next,
they'll give him a side trial for taking
the Tuberculosis (BCG) inoculation off
the US market. As a naturopath I’m
not supposed to like inoculations but
the BCG jab was the strongest immune
system strengthener in the world. Period.
The pharmaceutical companies wanted it
gone because they wanted people to get
sicker than they were up to that time
in the late 70’s. Countries who
still do the BCG injection have populations
with stronger immune systems than we
have here in the US. America has become
considerably sicker now than we were
back 30 years ago. That point cannot
be argued.
The heaviest
charges will go against Clinton's FDA
head for conveniently losing the 1993
UK studies on Prozac that showed the
drug caused teens and kids to go into
flamingly aggressive behavior and sometimes
kill themselves! These studies came to
light again in 2005 with the former FDA
head claiming never to have seen or known
of them. Mind you in 1993 this lowly
naturopath read a journal article commenting
on the tendency to mania (uncontrolled
violent behavior), and suicide that those
studies showed. How could I know and
the chief of FDA not know? The major
legal question is: will he be tried individually
for each kid whose killed himself or
others since being on Prozac? Or, will
he be tried for mass murder for every
kid on Prozac whose killed himself and
every kid killed in Prozac related school
violence from Columbine to the Univ.
of Virginia? The judges and prosecutors
will have to work that one out.
Most
everyone in any position of influence
in FDA came there from the drug companies
and when they leave FDA they go back
to working for the drug firms. Congressional
watchdog committees have commented on
this but have done nothing about it because
the legal drug cartels are super major
contributors to political campaigns and
have most all politicos on both sides
of the isle in their pockets. Pfizer
can be accused of paying off Clinton's
FDA chief to look the other way on Prozac
by giving him a 7 figure salary for merely
advising (i.e. doing nothing) and Pfizer
got him the job as the president of Yale
Med school. Not a bad deal, (for him).
As this
rotten bunch of professional beaurocrats
and politicos get strapped onto the execution
tables and injected to death, (can we
use their own companies drugs to execute
them?), there won’t be a soul outside
the prison gates lamenting their passing
or asking for leniency. And, more importantly,
the current crop of beaurocrats will
be much more interested in the public
safety than increasing their opulent
lifestyle at the cost of public suffering.
After they clean-up the FDA, then they
can sick the new law on the congress
critters! Ah, aren’t dreams wonderful!
|
